If you work with proxy footage that still looks great and only the rendering to a final format is slow, that is much more acceptable since it won’t hurt the author during the creation process. That said, it depends on WHEN it is too slow. I agree - with 2.6 teraflops, although unclear how that translates to real world use, seems like a modest GPU and underpowered for high end work. Has anyone seen any gpu benchmarks posted? But perhaps there will be a future model that has expandable memory, or at least more memory options, dedicated gpu or egpu support, etc. I don't see this Mac Mini being used for any serious editing work. This as a massive impact on speed of workflow. A slow GPU means far fewer real time renders of transitions and effects. Especially since it's sharing RAM with everything else. Having said that, a lot of it depends on what kind of optimisations they've done with the OS.īut conventional thinking would reckon 16GB is quite tight for high end video work.ġ6GB is tight for high end web browsing. My question, however, is whether or not it can run Resolve, Final Cut, Frame.io, Adobe and Nuke all at the same time. I agree that the new M1 chip looks like it could run any of those apps and get great performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |